You have too many possible starting points
Several tasks could use AI, but the team cannot test everything. You need to choose work that matters and is realistic to change.
AI adoption support for managers
Your team has access to AI, but use is scattered. Several tasks could improve, ownership is unclear, and it is difficult to know what is worth the time and cost.
In one private working session, we choose where AI can help, discuss the tools that fit your team, and make a three-week plan for how to start and what to review.
Pilot price: US$200
Five places are available for this first pilot. There is no payment when you send a request.
Does this sound familiar?
You may already have tools and interested people. The management work is choosing one task, deciding who checks the work, and knowing what would make the test worth continuing.
Several tasks could use AI, but the team cannot test everything. You need to choose work that matters and is realistic to change.
Some people use AI often, others barely touch it, and no shared way of working has become part of the normal week.
The result may be inconsistent, expensive, difficult to check, or ignored by the people who are meant to use it.
A real example
This is the level of detail we work with. Your plan uses the situation you bring, the people involved, and the limits inside your team.
After three weekly updates, the manager can continue, change the workflow, limit its use, or stop. The decision is based on what happened, not on what the tool promised.
How it works
The format is focused so you have time to try the plan and bring useful evidence to the follow-up.
You send a short description of the situation. I review it before we meet, so we can use the session well.
We compare possible starting points and suitable tools, question assumptions, and choose one useful change for your team to test.
You use a concise plan that covers the work, tool approach, responsibilities, first steps, checks, cost, and evidence you need.
We review what happened and decide what to continue, change, limit, or stop.
Experience behind the session
My work covers engineering, marketing, growth, and product systems. I deal with the same questions this session addresses: useful work, tool choice, clear ownership, quality, cost, and what to do when a result is incomplete.
Engineering work
Technical qualification and code review support
Marketing and growth
Research, content planning, and performance analysis
Products and systems
AgentHub workflows and the Estuddo study product
What is included
The session includes tool guidance and practical first steps. Building integrations, configuring company systems, coding, team training, extra meetings, and ongoing support are separate services.
Questions
Bring two or three tasks or team problems. We will compare them and choose where to focus.
Yes. We can review an effort with weak participation, inconsistent quality, unclear ownership, rising cost, or a result that is difficult to trust.
Yes, when choosing a tool is part of the problem. We look at the tools you already have first, then compare other options based on the work, company rules, integrations, cost, and what your team can support.
No. We can work with a simplified description. Remove names, customer information, internal figures, and other sensitive details from the request.
There is no payment when you send the request. I review it first. If the session is a good fit, I send a secure Stripe payment link and available meeting times.
Yes. The session and written plan can be in English or Portuguese.
First pilot
I read every request personally and reply within two business days. If I do not think the session fits your situation, I will tell you clearly.
Pilot price: US$200
Payment is requested only after I confirm that the session is a good fit.